Global News: 'The father is opposed to having the boy [given an ineffective and experimental gene therapy], believing that the [clot shot] is too new to know the long-term impacts. Further, he said his son had already developed immunity as a result of recovering from COVID-19 and argued that the risk of harm from the vaccine outweighs the possible benefit he may receive from the vaccine.
'All of his arguments were rejected by [the radical judge Cathie] Heinrichs, who relied on case precedent that has established that during the pandemic, health restrictions have been imposed to control the spread of the virus, which has been deadly for some, and that the Pfizer vaccine is safe and effective for use in both children and adults.'