National Post: MacKay's article has one purpose: not to help Canadians, not to improve the situation, but to remind Canadians about what a useless tool MacKay is and to intimate his desire to run against Pierre Poilievre.
In this article (read it if you're keen on parsing through hollow rhetoric and back-breaking mental gymnastics), MacKay suggests that Canadians have a right to protest, but then argues that if such protests are inconvenient for the ruling elite, they're unlawful.
He calls Canadian citizens, Canadian taxpayers, protesting medical tyranny in THEIR capital near THEIR capitol 'occupiers'.
Finally, he virtue signals by suggesting that working and middle-class Canadians--those who've been peaceful and immensely successful over these past few weeks--ought to emulate Tamil protesters who were speaking out about ills, not manifest in Canada or faced by Canadians, but taking place in a foreign land owing to misdeeds by a foreign power. MacKay prefers dissent that doesn't challenge the Canadian ruling elite, but protestation that insists upon greater interventionism by his ilk.
Comments